🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where Black people are remunerated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to erase African American heritage and experience from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month symbolises how little it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that face all if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.